#ruby-lang - Fri 23 Mar 2007 between 12:30 and 12:34

NY Lost Funds



apeirosthe first meaning is barrier, grid, fence
nullieruby is lot to do about lobsters
LoganCapaldochrissturm: we promise to stop as soon as somehow has a ruby question :)
apeirosnow you have 2 indirections... so the meaning is quite distorted :)
LoganCapaldoI mean we could sit in silence I suppose
shevyhow do lobsters code in ruby? :)
LoganCapaldoslowly
chrissturmshevy: probably with textmate
nullieIn Russian cancer and lobster are the same word
apeiroschrissturm complained? /me blind?
shevyhahaha
drfreezeAm I just dreaming or did ruby use to have a protected_class_method method
apeirosyou're dreaming
it has protected
LoganCapaldodrfreeze: Or you were using rails
apeirosclass <<self; def klassmethod; protected :klassmethod
shevyor smoking pot!
LoganCapaldocause if anything has a protected class method its rails
drfreezeyeah, may have been in rails
LoganCapaldos/its/it's/
shevyrails has all kinds of strange methods
apeiroswell, I still say there is no such thing as a class-method in ruby :-p
shevy.pluralize .humanize .lobsterize
LoganCapaldoapeiros: full ACK
drfreezeapeiros: funny, but true
nulliehumm... there is crayfish also
shevyomg
drfreezepeoples minds tend to implode when you tell them that a class is an object
apeirosactually it goes so far that I think it would be easier for people to grock ruby if we'd drop that terminology
LoganCapaldoin rails two point oh it will be .plural.ize, .lobster.ize, .human.ize
nulliecancer - @0: - crayfish (or lobster)
shevylol
drfreezeI see some people use @@ and class methods all over the place
shevythat sounds like a step back
drfreezejust can't figure out how those people think
shevymaybe they dont think
apeirosvoodoo-coders :)
shevybut who cares as long as they maintain their things :)
drfreezemy question is why why why?
we should create a honeypot version of ruby with @@@super_class_names :)

Page: 2 9 16 23 30 37 44 51 58 65 72 

IrcArchive

NY Lost Funds