| scoopr | :P |
| mksm | h = Hash.new([]); h[:foo] << 'bar' # Shouldn't this work? |
| scoopr | has it gained mindshare in rails community? =) |
| chris2 | scoopr: we can run simple rails apps already thanks to Qerub but the problem really is rails, and how it thinks it owns ruby :P |
| manveru | lol |
| scoopr | heh =) |
| manveru | there was just the same discussion on the nitro ML |
| chris2 | manveru: just try to run two rails apps in the same process. great. i'm not sure if ramaze doesnt suffer that too, btw :-P |
| manveru | how nitro uses facets and rails owns the world... |
| chris2 | facets are the same shit |
| manveru | all collide i'll remove most of my snippets once the code settles down as well or at least namespace it |
| remy | hi |
| chris2 | manveru: i more mean Request.current |
| manveru | oh threads? |
| chris2 | or does ramaze ensure it owns the thread? |
| manveru | it doesn't start anything else in there and it's seperate from Thread.main dunno how to make it 'owned' :) |
| chris2 | hm mongrel and webrick start a new thread, so that's safe fcgi, i dont know if it blocks, it's safe too |
| manveru | well, i start all of them in a new thread |
| chris2 | oh, fine then |
| manveru | mongrel does it by default |
| chris2 | cause AR::Base does some stupid things |
| manveru | hmh i actually never tried to run AR alongside ramaze only Og, which works fine |
| chris2 | k how does sqlite3 deal with multiple writers, btw? |
| manveru | afaik it queues them |
| chris2 | so that works? with multiple processes? |