| AsSlowAsHell | ok |
| Greatred | preferably the entire containing block around the finally: clause |
| AsSlowAsHell | yep http://deadbeefbabe.org/paste/4109 |
| Ind[y] | cya Greatred |
| Greatred | AsSlowAsHell: ah yes, i think i see it |
| ZeriouS | Hello :) |
| Greatred | earlier than a certain version of python (2.5? 3??) having both except and finally on the same try block doesn't work |
| AsSlowAsHell | Greatred, oh really? what is it. I wonder why it works in python 2.5 and not in python 2.4 |
| Greatred | ah yes to fix: |
| AsSlowAsHell | ah |
| Greatred | put the try and except inside a try block |
| AF-Slash | Is there a way to have a non turnicated result from devision? |
| AsSlowAsHell | ahh ok ill do that |
| Greatred | and have the finally block attached to the outer try |
| AsSlowAsHell | to keep backwards compatabilty |
| Greatred | yep, should do it |
| AsSlowAsHell | thankfully i only have 3 of those blocks in my code so far haha |
| toxik | When I use implied line continuation with parenthesis, should the extended lines be indented one more level or not? |
| ben_goodger | AF-Slash: if the result is a recurring number, no |
| Greatred | it's a trivial change, so :) |
| AsSlowAsHell | yeah thanks :D |
| ben_goodger | AF-Slash: but I believe python stores a very large number of places internally and then truncates to about ten places on display |
| AF-Slash | ben_goodger, even on non recurring numbers it turnicates to intigers or floating to the largest leading 0 |
| ben_goodger | AF-Slash: integer division returns integers in python |
| AF-Slash | and what is the diffrenece between / and // |
| ben_goodger | I don't know but if you want a float, you must put floats in |
| Greatred | using // is *forced* integer division |
| ben_goodger | e.g. 14/10=1; 14.0/10=1.4 |
| Greatred | in future 14/10 won't give you an int but 14//10 will |
| ben_goodger | Greatred: I'm aware of this |
| Greatred | :) |
| AF-Slash | Greatred, isnt that planed for 3.x? |
| ben_goodger | however, since we are not using G5 processors, the future is not now |