| kjdis | yeah I tried that but I must've made some kind of mistake oh, I think I know Why isn't it my($element) ? |
| integral | kjdis: Ambiguity. And it's just not :-) |
| cfedde | It kinda sucks that the best game for the wii is wii sports |
| Juerd | I want Wii Tetris |
| Apachez | where can I find a definition for how system() can be called ? should the arguments to the called binary be in the same scope? like system("someapp -a value"); ? |
| integral | perldoc -f system |
| Apachez | or should it be splitted ? thanks |
| integral | Always prefer the list form unless you need the shell. jobs-- |
| Apachez | so system 'someapp', '-a value -b value'; ? |
| integral | no, you need separate arguments to be separate. |
| Apachez | so system 'someapp', '-a value', '-b value'; ? |
| mauke | system( 'someapp', '-a', 'value', '-b', 'value' lern2shell |
| integral | Spaces separate arguments in the shell. You have to do that separation yourself here. And not just RANDOMLY. |
| Apachez | ohh oki i thought system("someapp -a value -b value"); would just work out of the box |
| mauke | it does |
| Apachez | many scripts in debian is constructed that way |
| mauke | (and it doesn't even spawn a shell) |
| integral | yes, I said *prefer* the list form. Do you understand what "prefer" means? |
| Apachez | yes thats what I want well if you "prefer" something there is a reason for that ? |
| mauke | but system qw(someapp -a value -b value); isn't significantly harder to type |
| Apachez | or do you just "prefer" out of random? |
| integral | No, I prefer it because you don't need interpolation when you start to use variables to construct the command. |
| Phocean | hi can anyone have one more look at my problem please ? http://perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=613374 |
| integral | .oO( Chatter box ) |
| Phocean | I can't get rid of that |
| action | CPAN upload: RRDTool-Creator-0.3 by JACQUELIN |
| CPAN | upload: RRDTool-Creator-0.3 by JACQUELIN |
| f00li5h | integral: chatter box is turn based irc |