| jnsears | use C |
| f00li5h | sbingner: you have to transpose the matirx each time, and that's expensive Daveman: what's the transpose of [ [1,2], [8] ] ? |
| sbingner | I'm missing something... don't you know what element the transposed value would be in? |
| Daveman | wtf? |
| sbingner | just reference it in the original array |
| Daveman | foolish, right-side-up triangle? |
| f00li5h | Daveman: why not just use $array->[$y][$x] to transpose it? |
| Daveman | ;P haha foolish, that's what I said! |
| sbingner | that's essentially what I was saying |
| f00li5h | Daveman: horray, now i hilight on foolish as well as f00li5h ^_^ |
| Daveman | Sorry that's what I referred to as the old-fashioned way :p |
| f00li5h | sbingner: that's not a function at all Daveman: oh, i see |
| Daveman | since that's like the first thingyou learn in any language :P C/C++ |
| f00li5h | i thought you were going to transpose it |
| Daveman | WELCOME TO REPETITION STRUCTURES! ^_^ Foolish, I am, silly :P |
| f00li5h | Daveman: perhaps that's why we get on so well |
| sbingner | f00li5h, right but this is : sub transpose { return ${$_[0]}[$_[2]][$_[1] } |
| f00li5h | sbingner: what the hell is that? |
| sbingner | confusing! lol |
| Daveman | though honestly, if you did some nasty split reverse split split reverse deal, you could probably pull it off as well, given some initial assumptions. winnar :p |
| f00li5h | sbingner: transpose [ []. [] ] , 2 ,3 ? |
| Daveman | wtf? |
| f00li5h | but that doesn't transpose anything it is a geter transpose implies that it changes the structure |
| Daveman | Foolish, I believe you're beginning to fulfill your namesake. :p |
| sbingner | ok, "get_transposed" |
| f00li5h | Daveman: ^_^ |
| Daveman | Foolish, it doesn't mean anything WILL change, however! and mathematically you cannot transpose the bullshit you're making up... like {EMPTY HASH}, \[ARRAYREF], BANANA |