| cfedde | uid and what ever the bindDN is? that'd be wrong. |
| action | cfedde goes back to look at the doc. |
| cfedde | goes back to look at the doc. it's been a while... |
| tag | cfedde: I don't even know what you're talking about, bindDN you mean this... |
| hobbs | cfedde: are you looking at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_auth_ldap.html ? |
| pheorehs | sili: any luck ? |
| tag | you mean this... AuthLDAPBindDN "OU=users,D=marchex,DC=com" |
| sili | pheorehs: sec, have to do work things |
| cfedde | hobbs: yea |
| pheorehs | sili: by all means :) |
| cfedde | ldap://host:port/basedn?attribute?scope?filter lots of encoding in there. |
| tag | cfedde: ?attribute?scope?filter -- do I need any of that shiza? |
| cfedde | tag: you have the search base. uid is the default attribute and you don't need a filter. you've traced from the ldap server's side? you don't need the bind? |
| tag | I don't know heh |
| action | cfedde remembers spending some time with tcpdump watching ldap requests go back and forth |
| cfedde | remembers spending some time with tcpdump watching ldap requests go back and forth tag: you've done testing with the openladp command line tools? or some other ldap tool? gq? |
| action | cfedde has to bolt. Back later maybe |
| cfedde | has to bolt. Back later maybe |
| tag | cfedde: no, the box is using the same ldap server with pam though |
| jdv79 | nice |
| Randal | it's like the tides comings and goins of people |
| jdv79 | huh? |
| hobbs | whooosh. |
| jdv79 | i sort of agree with somian - its been better in here in the past |
| hobbs | whoooooosh. |
| sili | pheorehs: heh, too much stuff to do. are you sure you don't want one of the Permute modules? |
| jdv79 | but i think he's a little over the top with his assessment |
| sili | jdv79: no, we must convene to establish a fixed set of rules for conduct. this is a zero tolerance establishment. |
| jdv79 | what? surely you're not serious |
| sili | i'm very serious. except when I'm not. |