#perl - Tue 27 Mar 2007 between 09:56 and 10:01



threat2rindolf: you sound like a bot
rindolfthreat2: I am a bot.
rindolfbot.
But I can pass the Turing test.
threat2: http://www.shlomifish.org/ - that's my home page.
perlygatekeeperrindolf, stop messing with the noobs
how are you doing BTW
rindolfperlygatekeeper: in Soviet Russia the noobs mess with you!
peterSrindolf: you forgot to mention in your essay what actual problems you hoped to solve. lots of "it would be better" but not a lot of "because..."
rindolfperlygatekeeper: I'm fine.
perlygatekeeper: I got layed off.
perlygatekeeper: and feel good about it.
perlygatekeepershit, I'm sorry
rindolfMy job was OK, but I have a lot to do besides.
ofer0rindolf, "Linus may not disapprove but since Linux is open source, you don't need to ask"
rindolfpeterS: I have some problems mentioned there.
perlygatekeeperenjoy it for a while and then get a better and higher-paying job
ofer0do you mean "Linus may disapprove" ?
rindolfofer0: so?
ofer0not disapprove = approve
rindolfofer0: oh! Right.
peterSrindolf: I guess I only noticed you talking about theoretical problems. what about problems _in practice_?
rindolfofer0: thanks, fixed.
ofer0: reload.
peterS: well, how about that there's Linus and Andrew as the bottleneck?
ofer0rindolf, :)
rindolfAnd there is fewer progress.
Web 2.0!
xandless.
rindolfxand: right, sorry.
ofer0++
perlbot: karma ofre0
perlbotofre0 doesn't have any karma
rindolfperlbot: karma ofer0
perlbotKarma for ofer0: 668
peterSrindolf: is that theoretical or practical? unless you can point to actual patches that would be applied faster, with the same amount of peer review, than they are today ... it's theoretical
ofer0ofer0-- ofer0--
rindolfpeterS: I don't mind solving some theoretical problems.
perlbot: karma ofer0
perlbotKarma for ofer0: 666

Page: 2 9 16 23 30 37 44 51 58 65 72 79 86 93 100 107 114 

IrcArchive