#apache #archlinux #asterisk #centos #debian #gentoo #haskell #kde #kubuntu #lisp #math #mysql #perl #python #ruby-lang #rubyonrails #suse #ubuntu #vim #wikipedia 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Top Prev 3411 3412 3413 3414 3415 3416 3417 3418 3419 3420 3421 3422 3423 3424 3425 3426 3427 3428 3429 Next
#haskell
<sorear> standard, yeah - it's in the standard extralibs bundle
<sorear> whoever compiled your ghc messed up and put arrrows into its own package
<monochrom> I wouldn't say it's messed up.
<sorear> I would.
<iron32> Well good night all thanks again for the help
<monochrom> There are now two rivaling philosophies on distributing ghc. Some say include those libs. Some others say separately. The debianians are inclined to the latter.
<thorat> but they failed to package it seperately as well
<LoganCapaldo> the debianians are always inclined to seperate things
<thorat> that's what I mean by the apt-cache search comment
<kc5tja> I prefer Debianese over Debianians. :)
<LoganCapaldo> they're seperatists I say
<monochrom> I'm going to name you the arrows package.
<kc5tja> Although I'm a Slackwarian myself. :)
<sorear> libghc6-arrows-dev, if it exists
<monochrom> libghc6-arrows-dev, available in both "unstable" and "testing"
<LoganCapaldo> they've also chopped ruby into teeny tiny little pieces
<monochrom> http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=arrow&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
<lambdabot> Title: Debian -- Debian Package Search Results, http://tinyurl.com/2e8f7q
<thorat> aaaaah,
<sorear> libghc6-$package-dev
<monochrom> I don't use Debian and I still know how to find.
<thorat> you're right, why did the apt-cache search not find it
<monochrom> apt-get update ? :)
<thorat> sorry
<monochrom> Or you're on "stable"? :)
<thorat> no, it's because I used arrows, not arrow
<monochrom> oops :)
<thorat> and arrows only occurs in the title
<thorat> not the desctription
<thorat> hrmf
<LoganCapaldo> @arr
<lambdabot> Aye Aye Cap'n
<monochrom> computers are still dumb :)
<LoganCapaldo> @type arr
<lambdabot> forall b c (a :: * -> * -> *). (Arrow a) => (b -> c) -> a b c
<lispy> monochrom: yeah, but at least they're not idiots
<LoganCapaldo> @type arr id
<lambdabot> forall b (a :: * -> * -> *). (Arrow a) => a b b
<LoganCapaldo> That's funny
<LoganCapaldo> I was kind of expecting (->) b b
<kc5tja> Dude, wtf? Did the author of lambdabot think of every conceivable mistyped @-code? That was the funniest response from a bot I've ever seen!
<monochrom> Initially I thought of using "debians" to refer to debian people. :)
<allbery_b> @help arr
<lambdabot> arr. Talk to a pirate
<LoganCapaldo> @vixen you've seen naugh yet
<lambdabot> <undefined>
<TSC> Duh, I installed HaXml from source this morning without even checking the debian packages |:
<LoganCapaldo> hmm
<kc5tja> @noodly appendage
<lambdabot> Unknown command, try @list
Previous Page Next Page