Safrole | 2 of them are wrong. |

Copter | You are just being a smartass ninja to be a hero gg x1= 2007 THEN THE SEQUENCE ISNT BOUNDED ABOVE by 1, THATS FUCKING RETARDED. gg |

chessguy | haha |

Copter | go learn math ;o |

Safrole | He's a troll |

Copter | stfu u r a troll |

Safrole | There's no way this guy is fucking serious |

chessguy | Safrole: yeah, i'm leaning that direction now too |

Fangz | Copter: Do you know *why* that proof could work? |

Copter | Fangz: its works people got all the points proving it properly. And believe me those 2 proffesors are nazis so they arent giving points for "being in the direction" or other crap. |

Safrole | Can we get a kick? |

Fangz | I mean, why does the proof that 1/n -> 0 using 1/n>0 wroks? |

chessguy | @op |

mbot | Maybe you meant: . id map pl rc v wn yow |

chessguy | bah |

Littlebob | what is the equation for finding a matrix' inverse? |

Safrole | There is no equation Littlebob It's rather an algorithm |

sorje | det(A) = A * adj(A) |

Littlebob | thats what i ment hehe |

Fangz | Looking at it now, the proof given by the professors is correct but there is a step missing |

Copter | Fangz: its my proof, it is flawed. |

Safrole | What's correct about it Fangz? .... |

Copter | and yes it is missing somethign i wanna know what |

Fangz | Safrole: The fact that x<1 means that it is monotonically increasing |

Copter | 3X_n/3X_n <=1 but thats "trivial" i thought i dont have to do that. |

Safrole | no it doesn't. |

Copter | Yea Fangz is lost too, gg :D |

Safrole | A sequence can be bounded and not monotically increase It shows nothing |

Fangz | the difference between successive terms is (-x^2 + 2x - 1)/(x^2 + x + 1) |

Safrole | In this case, a subsequence is bounded by 1 |