#haskell - Thu 10 May 2007 between 00:01 and 00:15

NY Lost Funds



nn-main@version
lambdabotlambdabot 4p525, GHC 6.6 (Linux i686 2.66GHz)
darcs get http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/lambdabot
Sgeoepigram/
?
LoganCapaldoSamB: I have no idea
Maybe not
wySgeo: Yes. The language Epigram
It seem to have a two dimentional syntax
sorearSo does haskell :)
wysorear: But haskell doesn't have horizontal bars there
dmwitEw, epigram looks gross.
Although having first-class types sounds interesting.
wyI think maybe they should use a graphical interface like mathematica, then use a one dimentional source language in the back end.
dmwitYeah, that would make a lot more sense.
actionSgeo points bd_ to how functions can be instances of Show
Sgeopoints bd_ to how functions can be instances of Show
dmwitThey must have a real headache parsing that layout.
bd_Sgeo: Not /useful/ instances :)
Though if you just want to derive Show I guess it's useful
SgeoIt's useful if you want to just be able to type in things like Just Right
And see what shows up
wyYes. I believe that parsing shouldn't be hard.
actionSgeo would have a real headache typing in code for that language
Sgeowould have a real headache typing in code for that language
bd_:t Just Right
lambdabotforall b a. Maybe (b -> Either a b)
bd_:)
Sgeo@fact Goldilocks
lambdabotgoldilocks: What did Goldilocks say upon seeing "Maybe (b -> Either a b)"? It's Just Right!
bd_@djinn Maybe (b -> Either a b)
lambdabotf = Nothing
bd_heh
dolioYou wouldn't type it all in yourself. The editing environment is designed to give you help.
SgeoIs the editing environment available for Linux?
dolioIt's an editing mode in xemacs, I believe.
actionSgeo is mildly scared of Emacs
Sgeois mildly scared of Emacs
wydolio: why XEmacs? I have been used to use Emacs.
Sgeo@src Right
lambdabotSource not found. Wrong! You cheating scum!
Sgeo>.>
@src (++)

Page: 2 9 16 23 30 37 44 51 58 65 

IrcArchive

NY Lost Funds