| dcoutts | or do we have to keep guessing? |
| dons | i bet generic data traversal. or else, as a benchmark |
| fasta | What option do I need to add to use the GHC break point stuff? It might help in this case, although I don't expect it to. |
| Cale | @type callCC |
| lambdabot | forall a (m :: * -> *) b. (MonadCont m) => ((a -> m b) -> m a) -> m a |
| dons | @type Data.Generic.Basics.gunfold |
| lambdabot | Couldn't find qualified module. |
| ivanm | for lhs2tex, how do I put boxes around all my code? |
| dons | @type Data.Generics.Basics.gunfold |
| lambdabot | forall (c :: * -> *) a. (Data a) => (forall b r. (Data b) => c (b -> r) -> c r) -> (forall r. r -> c r) -> Constr -> c a |
| dons | its time like this I suspect Data.Generics was written just to test the type checker |
| action | dons type runhaskell Setup.hs configure to build an autoconf'd C program |
| dons | type runhaskell Setup.hs configure to build an autoconf'd C program haskell eats my brain |
| Cale | http://f8d.org/?c=44 |
| lambdabot | Title: Moments |
| fasta | What does this mean? *** Exception: No match in record selector Var.tcTyVarDetails A bug in the debugger? |
| Cheery | @djinn ((t -> Maybe a -> t1) -> t -> t1) -> ((t -> Maybe a -> t1) -> t -> t1) -> ((t -> Maybe a -> t1) -> t -> t1) |
| lambdabot | f a b c d = a (\ _ e -> case e of Nothing -> b (\ _ f -> case f of Nothing -> c d Nothing Just g -> c d (Just g)) d Just h -> c d (Just h)) d |
| dons | hehe |
| fridim | I didn't find it in the FAQ. Why an object oriented haskell (o'haskell for instance) didn't worked as Ocaml has worked for caml ? I mean is OOP really not needed ? |
| Cheery | dons: my stylesheet stuff reduced to this form: background (color 255 255 0 . image "foobar.png" . fixed) now I'm wondering which would be the best way to implement it. :) |
| mr_tenor | fridim: what is lacking in the language? |
| Cheery | I think the color, image, fixed, etc. -stuff should be just functions, not methods but then, what kind of beast should be created then? and should I forget about using the function composition? |
| fridim | mr_tenor: I don't know haskell, I'am just asking |
| dons | fridim: yeah, the O caml part is just buzz, no one uses it. and similarly, OO just leads to ugly code in haskell too |
| mr_tenor | fridim: i'm still a haskell n00b, but i find the type system better than, say, c++ and java |