|monochrom||I love the editor.|
|jcreigh||I'm thinking screen <-> workspace mapping.|
I don't know of anywhere else offhand.
|monochrom||Can I download it somewhere? Is it written in Haskell?|
|dons||jcreigh: hmm, so I'd like to combine the StackSet and workspace data|
so we have a single type we can check modelling the entire workspace/screen/stack
so, OneToOne is the top level?
yielding a StackSet for each screen?
|fuzan||Operations.hs:120:26: Not in scope: `waBorderWidth'|
|jcreigh||tenatively, I'm thinking having, viewports :: OneToOne ScreenNumber WorkspaceNumber in StackSet|
|dons||fuzan: update X11-extras|
|jcreigh||that wouldn't really be a major change from what we have now, expect nicer lookups and being in StackSet instead of XMonad.|
|dons||jcreigh: hmm, maybe send a draft api to me and sjanssen ?|
yes, minimal changes to merge the xinerama changes into stackset seem good.
we want to release around the 13th.
|dons||yeah. i guess.|
|fuzan||i'm giving somewhat of an introductory talk on haskell tomorrow. anyone have any previous experience in doing such?|
|lambdabot||dmwit is in #haskell and #haskell-blah. I last heard dmwit speak 1h 35m 18s ago.|
|jcreigh||dmwit: how do you feel about Xinerama in xmonad?|
|dmwit||I was wondering early today: is xmonad still in feature freeze?|
until 0.1 is out
|jcreigh||dmwit: are you still thinking disjoint workspaces would be better?|
|sjanssen||thinking about the relationships between entities in StackSet reminds me of SQL|
|dmwit||jcreigh: I think it's unnecessary.|
I've gotten use to the current setup, and it isn't so bad.
|jcreigh||okay, then we'll keep the current system for now.|
|dons||wow, i got an email just now from a guy on openbsd building ghc purely to try out xmonad|
|jcreigh||The nice thing about having one StackSet is that it already has the invariant that a window can only be in one stack. If you have multiple stack sets running around, you lose that.|
|sjanssen||jcreigh: yeah, there should be one StackSet|
|jcreigh||There can only one!|
*be only one
|sjanssen||we may need to just handle invariants like one-to-one by hand|
|dons||btw, i'm waiting on simon mar for details on the xmonad mailing list.|