#debian - Wed 14 Mar 2007 between 00:00 and 00:26

NY Lost Funds



cwheelervi(m) has it's own keys right?
Azarwell it has
mtomczakHm. I seem to have gotten myself in a real bind...
Azarif you got vim , typing vimtutor will show you all it does
Guerincwheeler: iceweasel used to have such an option
mtomczakI'm currently using Etch (v4.0, testing). Does anyone know what my apt sources.list should look like to access the package tree for etch?
cwheelerI didn't find it in the properties menus
Guerinsorry, firefox
cwheelerright firefox 1.5 did
karstenOn RAM, maximum needed: "The reason is simple. Somewhere in the 50 to 200 megabyte range, all applications, (or at least their active portion), will reside in memory. Doubling memory may allow the entire set of applications to reside in memory, but the performance gain will be small. The larger the memory capacity, the smaller the gain. As a result, additional RAM memory will not be added."
http://tinyurl.com/2679gx
On Usenet, you're stupid forever.
Guerinkarsten: those were the days
actionkarsten hopes nobody searches his stuff...
karstenhopes nobody searches his stuff...
AzarLess memory means more swap.
maddashkillall ssh
alskdjfasfa;lskdfj sa lkadklna al da
oops
Azarhehe cat walking on your keyboard?
maddashnope. crappy icewm theme that's gotten me confused as to which window has the focus.
jahshuae7 ftw!
abrotmanyou know .. they're up to e17 now ...
jahshuaeek
haha
:D
maddashe17::anna nicole as icewm::....well, the girl next door.
Guerinmaddash: you mean, fake, superficial and dead?
Azaroops popcon reported having bugs
maddashGuerin: sans dead and fake...
h3xisi lol'd
maddashGuerin: I was mostly juxtaposing the e17's heavy decorations to the heavy make up
mtomczakWhat does the error "Couldn't stat source package list" mean when aptitude starts?
Guerinmtomczak: it means what it says. Run `aptitude update' to fix it.
mtomczakOkay, cool. So "couldn't stat" means "File not found...
What threw me was I kinda expected that when I added a new package source to sources.list, aptitude would respond to not having ever cached that package source by caching it.
Dewimtomczak: just run another update if you're worried
mtomczak: and no, aptitude doesn't do anything to the caches until you ask for it by doing 'update'
Azareh?
oh here they are!
Gecko*yawn*

Page: 2 9 16 23 30 37 44 51 58 65 72 79 86 93 100 107 

IrcArchive

NY Lost Funds