Centos 5 does not support i586
|cluster-aware||i686 the lowest it goes?|
I tested it on my AMD K-6 machine and it would not install.
|Evolution||for now that's correct.|
|Evolution||it was the same for centos4. that was an addition we made.|
upstream does not support k6 or < i586 processors.
|Munchkinguy||Ok. So what if I install centos 4, download and compile the centos 5 kernel, download centos-release-5, and then upgrade all with yum?|
|Evolution||you'll spend quite a bit of time and frustration to end up with a system that won't work.|
Many of the binary RPMs depend on i686 minimum, I would assume
|n5red-4||Not all of my machines are i686|
|Evolution||yes. they expect certain things to be in place within glibc and other apps.|
n5red-4: welcome to the 21st century.. please consider upgrading to something made in the last 10 years.
|n5red-4||My Soekris net4801 was made in the last few years|
It's an AMD Geode.
|Munchkinguy||I guess I'll stick with 4.4, then|
|n5red-4||I'm not sure if my mini-ITX system is a full i686. 1GHz Via processor|
|Munchkinguy||(plus the RHEL artwork, 'cause its pretty)|
|lexton||I'm installing yum on centos 4.4, and I'm looking for the centos-yumconf-4-4.3.noarch.rpm|
is this still needed for yum or should I install another rpm?
|ZBandit||is it the 9th yet?|
|FireCat||Anyone know that when you start eclipse on CentOS5 Betsa the Splash screen comes up with Eclipse - Red hat Edition?|
... not that I care mind you
|ZBandit||perhaps that's why it's still beta?|
there are still 2 days (or so) to fix it. :)
|cosmic665||can someone provide me with a nice comprehensive list of preferred yum repos? which ones do I defainately need to avoid?|
|cluster-aware||Stick with the default - you;ll be fine|
|D-side||i might not have tried that explicitly. lets see.|
|cluster-aware||Cripes, you could be looking at local overhead (CPU, mem, etc.), fragmentation, rate-limiting (802.3x or TCP flow-control), poor cabling, poor wiring (is the wire bound too tightly with wire-wraps or strung over a flourescent ballast?), poor performance on the host....|
Dozens of things
I agree - your host, assuming they guarantee any sort of SLA should be able to assist
sysctl tuning isn't out of question, but may be a red herring