|imachine||hmm. what for really. irc has ssl....|
give it some space.
|phrik||foolish fools fooled with fooling foolery|
|imachine||remember, cb or what was it's name, was avail for a while :)|
plus, irc has it's climate.
|peh||imachine: sure, but there's more to SILC. SFTP, like I said, no nick collisions, and... other stuff|
remember PowWow? :rolleyes:
|imachine||peh, yeah, i'm well aware of that. tho you could do that perfectly over irc i suppose.|
|action||louipc does not|
|imachine||random nicknames from server, resolved over clients ?|
|imachine||louipc, but that's an im.|
irc never was really an im.
|louipc||no it isn't|
|peh||imachine: sure, so that's what I'm speculating.. if SILC will just remain a "lab/playground", and its technlogy adapted for IRC|
|imachine||despite kopetes and gaims tries at incorporating it as one.|
|louipc||it shouldn't be in an im client|
it's just wrong
|imachine||peh, maybe will maybe won't. we'll see.|
louipc, what, irc, or jabbr?
|peh||imachine: http://silcnet.org/general/about/features.php <- Some more info|
|imachine||yah, i know about silc. i read about it some time before when it appeared ion gaim orso.|
i like irc tho. and the main pointabout iming etc...
is s what good is it if ther's no one using it
|peh||yea, that's the one feature SILC lacks...|
in related news: Paris Hilton is going to jail! wohoo!
|stonecrest||who needs SILC when there is mugshot?|