| imachine | hmm. what for really. irc has ssl.... oic. well. yeash. give it some space. |
| cactus | !fool |
| phrik | foolish fools fooled with fooling foolery |
| imachine | remember, cb or what was it's name, was avail for a while :) plus, irc has it's climate. so ;] |
| peh | imachine: sure, but there's more to SILC. SFTP, like I said, no nick collisions, and... other stuff remember PowWow? :rolleyes: |
| imachine | peh, yeah, i'm well aware of that. tho you could do that perfectly over irc i suppose. |
| action | louipc does not |
| louipc | does not |
| imachine | random nicknames from server, resolved over clients ? |
| action | imachine remembers |
| imachine | remembers |
| louipc | jabber? |
| imachine | louipc, but that's an im. irc never was really an im. |
| louipc | no it isn't |
| peh | imachine: sure, so that's what I'm speculating.. if SILC will just remain a "lab/playground", and its technlogy adapted for IRC |
| imachine | despite kopetes and gaims tries at incorporating it as one. |
| louipc | it shouldn't be in an im client it's just wrong |
| imachine | peh, maybe will maybe won't. we'll see. :) louipc, what, irc, or jabbr? |
| stonecrest | im achine |
| louipc | irc |
| imachine | yah stonecrest, su p ;] |
| peh | imachine: http://silcnet.org/general/about/features.php <- Some more info |
| imachine | yah, i know about silc. i read about it some time before when it appeared ion gaim orso. i like irc tho. and the main pointabout iming etc... is s what good is it if ther's no one using it :) |
| peh | yea, that's the one feature SILC lacks... in related news: Paris Hilton is going to jail! wohoo! |
| stonecrest | who needs SILC when there is mugshot? |